HUNT-001 — Proton radius puzzle — door 1: one symbol, two lanes; lane-addressed, converged at 0.84 fm

WHAT THIS CERTIFICATE RECORDSHigh-value seam hunted from the literature: the decade-long 5.6σ “proton radius puzzle.” Door-1 diagnosis: ONE symbol r_p was fed by TWO lanes — electronic and muonic hydrogen — whose governing equations weight r_p by m_r³ (the muonic lane 6.43×10⁶ times more sensitive, computed cold). The e-lane’s systematics (line-interference in one-photon transitions, scattering normalization) were invisible at its weak sensitivity. Lane-addressed and re-measured, the e-lane CONVERGED to the μ-lane: PRad 0.831(14), H 2S–4P 0.8335(95), Toronto 0.833(10) — all at 0.84 fm. The literature’s own 2025–26 verdict (Miller, arXiv:2604.15546): “The proton radius puzzle is no more.” The seam was lane conflation — the NET-SEAM one-report-two-lanes family — not new physics; exactly what the recovered, lane-addressed equation predicted.

r_p (one symbol) ← {e-lane 0.8770(45) fm, μ-lane 0.84087(39) fm} — 5.6σ self-conflict
the projection: the lane address discarded; ΔE ∝ m_r³ r_p² sensitivity ratio (m_rμ/m_re)³ = 6.43×10⁶ ignored

r_p(lane) carried until the lanes agree: e-lane re-executed → 0.831–0.834 fm; μ-lane 0.84087(39)
→ one value, 0.84 fm; the conflict was the projection’s, never the proton’s

1 — broken governing equation

S2/S5 — address + lane

CLOSED_BY_LANE_ADDRESSING — confirmed by the field’s own re-measurements

GREEN — the resolution is published experimental record; the door-1 reading matches it

Pohl 2010; Xiong (PRad) 2019; Bezginov 2019; Grinin 2020; Miller arXiv:2604.15546 (2026); Jentschura 2304.06126