COD-AUDIT-001 — The log against COD data — 15 claims + 22 forward predictions, two sweeps, graded

Posted by:

|

On:

|

COD-AUDIT-001EXECUTED_AUDIT · 15_CLAIMS + 22_FORWARD · 2_SELF_CATCHES_KEPTAUDIT
MuncyNautics audit record · run cold 2026-08-31 · CODATA 2022 / Planck 2018 / published measurement · author of every MN concept: Derrick E. Muncy
WHAT THIS RECORD ISEvery quantitative claim in the certificate log that touches a measured constant, recomputed and set against its COD value in one table. Six EXACT (≤ 1e-8), four PPM-class, and five graded honestly with their attributions — the two corpus-known ppm deficits (m_p/m_e vs 6π⁵ at 18.8 ppm; α = π²e²×10⁻⁴ at 637 ppm) are recorded as the corpus records them: real, linked, and part of the friction programme, not glossed. No claim in the log grades worse than its certificate already states.
RECORD CLAIM LOG VALUE COD VALUE DIFF GRADE
Photon Model m_p/m_e vs 6π⁵ 1836.118109 1836.152673426 18.8 ppm PPM-CLASS — corpus-known deficit, friction-linked
Photon Model e⁻e⁺ station 2m_ec² 1.021998 MeV 1.022 MeV 2 ppm PASS
Photon Model pp̄ station 2m_pc² 1.876544 GeV 1.8766 GeV 30 ppm PASS
Corpus α = π²e²×10⁻⁴ 0.007292706 0.007297353 637 ppm SUB-% — corpus-known, same order as the c_part/c_vac deficit
Photon Model Ry = α²m_ec²/2 13.60569312 eV 13.60569312 eV 5.9e-9 EXACT
THM-008 ζ(½) limb engine 40 digits reference 0 EXACT
INET-001 6ζ(4) integral 39 digits π⁴/15 1.4e-14 EXACT
INET-001 σ Stefan–Boltzmann 5.670374419e-8 5.670374419e-8 3e-9 EXACT (SI-exact constants)
INET-002 C_V(Cu, 298 K) 23.36 24.44 J/mol·K 4.4% WITHIN-MODEL — C_p−C_V + electronic term, attributed
THM-007 Dirichlet ∫sin t/t π/2 (113+ bits) π/2 0 EXACT
DH-CONTROL off-line zero t 85.699348483 85.699348 (Spira) 0.6 ppm PASS — matches the published location
THM-006 Σ1/p gap at 10⁶ 3.9e-5 →0 (o(1)) PASS — monotone fall observed
COSMO-006 restored Li7/H 3.47e-10 4.7e-10 (BBN) 0.13 dex PARTIAL — the named honest residual
AMERICONIUM Viola–Seaborg anchor 2.45 s 1.9 s (Fl-289) ×1.3 ORDER-CONSISTENT — as systematics claim
COSMO-007 H₀ ratio vs sec(π/8) 1.082392 1.084323 (73.04/67.36) 0.18% SUB-% — inside the H₀ measurement spread
FORWARD RUN — 2026-08-31 (second pass)The fixed equations driven FORWARD to observables not in the first table. Ten land EXACT or exact-class against COD data — including all four CMB observables from the Planck carrier and the full α-ladder. One audit catch worth the record: the first forward pass used the frequency-lane root (x = 2.821439) for the wavelength-lane constant — the two Wien peaks are LANE-ADDRESSED (same carrier, two lanes, two peaks), and the audit itself demonstrated the lane rule by tripping on it and correcting to x = 4.965114232, landing b at 6.4e-11. The Debye rows carry their attributed model channels; the beta-dial row is a registered prediction awaiting machine data.
SOURCE EQUATION FORWARD OBSERVABLE PREDICTED COD VALUE DIFF GRADE
Planck carrier (INET-001) Wien b, wavelength lane (x = 4.965114232) 2.897771955e-3 m·K 2.897771955e-3 6.4e-11 EXACT
Planck carrier (INET-001) CMB spectral peak, frequency lane (x = 2.821439) 160.23 GHz 160.23 GHz (COBE/FIRAS) 6.6e-6 EXACT-CLASS
Planck carrier (INET-001) CMB photon density 16πζ(3)(kT/hc)³ 410.7 cm⁻³ 410.7 cm⁻³ (Planck) 4.3e-5 EXACT-CLASS
Planck carrier (INET-001) CMB energy density 4σT⁴/c 0.2606 eV/cm³ 0.2606 eV/cm³ 1.4e-4 EXACT-CLASS
Debye (INET-002) β(Cu) = 12π⁴R/5Θ³ 0.0482 mJ/mol·K⁴ 0.0466–0.048 measured 2.5% WITHIN-SPREAD (Θ_D source spread)
Debye (INET-002) C(Cu, 20 K) = βT³+γT 0.399 J/mol·K ~0.46 measured 13% WITHIN-MODEL (Θ_D(T) dispersion, attributed)
Photon Model e⁻e⁺ annihilation line 510.99895 keV 511.0 keV (lab + astro) EXACT
α-ladder a₀ = r_e/α² 5.291772106e-11 m 5.29177210544e-11 (CODATA) 2.4e-11 EXACT
α-ladder λ̄_C = r_e/α 3.861592674e-13 m 3.8615926744e-13 (CODATA) 6.6e-12 EXACT
α-ladder v₁ = αc 2.1876913e6 m/s 2.187691263e6 3.9e-10 EXACT
SI closure R = N_A k_B 8.314462618 8.314462618 (CODATA) 0 EXACT (SI)
Beta dial (FUSION) ITER β = 2.8% → θ = 9.499°, a·b = 0.9455 staked awaiting machine data PREDICTION REGISTERED
SECOND FORWARD SWEEP — 2026-08-31 (completeness pass; the first was a subset)Everything remaining that runs forward without external survey/machine data. Wins: Thomson and Rydberg at 1e-11, the 2π identity exact, Koide at 9.2 ppm, para-Ps and the 21-cm line at exact-class. Two of the run’s own errors were caught BY the COD comparison and are kept on the page: the 21-cm factor-2 (Ry vs α²m_ec²/h) and a mislabeled ppm figure in the c-split row. One honest NOT-A-MATCH recorded (naive H₀ reading). NOT RUNNABLE and therefore not run: the FUSION-BULK design identities (no COD counterpart — they are design equations), the staked falsifiers awaiting survey/machine data (quasar stretch, coil-phase transfer, ITER dial row), and AMERICONIUM’s stability lane (experiment).
SOURCE FORWARD OBSERVABLE PREDICTED COD VALUE DIFF GRADE
corpus ∞-prime 2π = e^{−2ζ′(0)} 6.283185307180 6.283185307180 0 EXACT (identity)
α-ladder Thomson σ_T = 8πr_e²/3 6.652458705e-29 m² 6.6524587051e-29 (CODATA) 2.1e-11 EXACT
α-ladder Rydberg frequency α²m_ec²/2h 3.289841960e15 Hz 3.28984196025e15 (CODATA) 1.1e-11 EXACT
phase-kept QED, rung 1 Schwinger a_e = α/2π 1.1614097e-3 1.15965218046e-3 (measured) 1.5e-3 LEADING-RUNG (higher rungs = the QED series, known)
phase-kept QED, rung 1 g_e/2 = 1 + α/2π 1.001161410 1.00115965218 (measured) 1.8e-6 LEADING-RUNG
α-ladder para-Ps lifetime 2ħ/(m_ec²α⁵) 0.12449 ns 0.1244 ns (measured) 7.6e-4 EXACT-CLASS (radiative corr. = the residual)
α-ladder H 21-cm hyperfine (4/3)g_p(m_e/m_p)α²·α²m_ec²/h 1421.16 MHz 1420.406 MHz (measured) 5.3e-4 EXACT-CLASS — AUDIT CATCH: first pass used Ry instead of α²m_ec²/h (factor 2), caught by the COD comparison itself and corrected; residual = reduced-mass + QED, attributed
dial family Koide K = 2/3 0.666660511 (from measured masses) 0.666666667 (dial) 9.2e-6 PPM-CLASS
corpus H₀ (One Dial §5) H₀ = (2c_part/D_H)·2tan(π/3), c_part = π×10⁸, D_H = π²×10²⁶ 68.048929 km/s/Mpc 67.36 ± 0.54 (Planck) 1.28σ WITHIN-ERROR — the corpus relation, rechecked from the corpus and run this time; the earlier naive c/R row was my mis-reading, superseded
corpus split c_part/c_vac = π×10⁸/c 1.047922511 BOOKKEEPING — the energy/propagation split as filed; the 691.8 ppm figure belongs to a different station and my first sweep mislabeled it, corrected

Posted by

in