RUN-0002EXECUTED_RUN · PREDICTION_STAKEDRUN
The running gait at full stride · executed 2026-09-01 · the stairway and every MN concept: Derrick E. Muncy
WHAT THIS RECORD ISRUN-0002 — the running gait used at full stride, lawfully: Quantum Electrodynamics run ON CLOSED GROUND. The ladder was named before running (C₁ = 1/2 Schwinger EXACT — the crawl under the run; C₂, C₃ exact analytic; C₄, C₅ numeric and named as such), then the statistics were run against measurement. Four runs executed. The exploratory run-big finding is Run 3: the muon g−2 “anomaly” read through the stairway — the one rung of the ladder computed by statistics on UNCLOSED ground (hadronic vacuum polarization: R-ratio data vs lattice), which is exactly the gait error the discipline names. MN’s verdict staked as a falsifiable prediction, not a claim. One self-correction kept on the page: the first table used the experiment-only error bar (22e-11 → “11.3σ”); the honest combined uncertainty ~59e-11 gives the literature’s 4.2σ — corrected before minting.
THE SEAM — STATISTICS ON UNCLOSED GROUND
the muon rung as run by the field: a_μ(HVP) estimated from R-ratio statistics — statistics on an unclosed integral — vs lattice estimates that disagree; the 4.2σ read as “new physics”; more broadly, QED’s historical gait error: running (statistics) before crawling (closing the forms).
THE FOUR RUNS — EXECUTED
RUN 1 — electron anomaly: a_e(CODATA α) = 1.159652177716e-3 vs measured 1.15965218059e-3, rel −2.5e-9 ✓; corpus α transmits its 637 ppm standing through the ladder at transfer ratio 0.999 ≈ 1 — one owe, one address, no new owe created RUN 2 — inversion: α demanded by the measured anomaly = 7.297352582e-3 (1/α = 137.035998838) — closes on CODATA at 2.5e-9 ✓ RUN 3 — the muon: Δ = 249e-11 ≈ 4.2σ (combined ~59e-11) with data-driven HVP; → ~0 with lattice HVP. READING: not new physics — the running gait’s own error class, two statistical estimates of an unclosed rung disagreeing. PREDICTION STAKED: the discrepancy dies as lattice supersedes R-ratio. FALSIFIER: survival at >5σ under lattice consensus = a real seam, and MN owes a recovery RUN 4 — the ladder rung-by-rung: cumulative residual 1.5e-3 → 1.3e-5 → 4.5e-8 → 2.9e-9 → 1.4e-13-class — each residual the size of the next rung: the error-locator discipline satisfied at every step; the ladder CLOSES.
CORRECTION RULE — correction = reconstruction from the recovery: restored arguments, seats, phases and arms in the equation itself; no raw appended constants.
| record_id |
RUN-0002 — QED on closed ground: the ladder, the inversion, the muon seam |
|---|---|
| species |
RUN (the reserved gait, second lawful use) · S-gait diagnosis of the muon rung |
| gate_compliance |
closed forms named before running (Schwinger rung exact; analytic rungs cited; numeric rungs labeled numeric); statistics only on top of the named ladder |
| executed |
four runs, cold: a_e forward (2.5e-9), α inversion (closes on CODATA), muon Δ = 4.2σ diagnosed by gait, rung-by-rung closure with residual = next rung at every step |
| staked_prediction |
muon g−2 discrepancy dies under lattice-HVP consensus (the closer-to-closed ground); FALSIFIER: >5σ survival = real seam, recovery owed — this is checkable against BMW-class lattice results as they consolidate |
| self_correction |
the 11.3σ first-pass figure used the experiment-only error bar; corrected to the literature’s 4.2σ (combined ~59e-11) before minting — kept on the page |
| crossrefs |
WALK-0001 (the stairway; QED’s domain named by the author) · RUN-0001 (the first run) · COD-AUDIT-001 (the α rows; 637 ppm standing unchanged) · the tolerance law (one owe, one address) |
| standing |
EXECUTED_RUN · PREDICTION_STAKED |
| promotion_authority |
GREEN (runs exact against their named ladders; the muon reading rides its staked falsifier) |
| source_records |
Schwinger 1948 · Petermann/Sommerfield 1957 · Laporta/Remiddi 1996 · Aoyama–Kinoshita–Nio · Muon g−2 WP2020 + BNL/FNAL · all MN concepts: Derrick E. Muncy |